Kruptikos: Socialism (1): The Scam of Utopia

  1. Share
11 2

i  ]

Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can. No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man. – John Lennon


When Satan tempted Eve, he offered her another way to bliss. When Satan tempted Jesus, he offered Him another way as well. Judas, no doubt, thought the way offered to him would lead to something better than what Jesus was offering.

Today, we have another proposition laid before us. It is just as tempting, because, on the surface, it sounds so good. And, again, all we have to do is turn from God and His ways and follow another path.

Jesus spoke of this as well when He said there were two ways before us, one was small and narrow and the other wide and broad (Matthew 7:13-14). By this, He was telling us that the wide gate and the broad road are certainly tempting… so tempting, in fact, that “many” go that way. Yes, it looks easier and it appears much more pleasant. There is even a hint of paradise at the end. But it is a false path, a deceptive way. It may appear pleasurable, but it leads, as Jesus told us, to destruction. 

So, too, the belief that there is a utopia at the end of the socialism path. It is so appealing, so alluring, so “right”, that many in our culture are again falling prey to its promises. 

John Lennon was a ‘believer’. He thought this was the paradise we should all pursue:

Imagine there’s no heaven. It’s easy if you try. No hell below us. Above us, only sky. Imagine all the people, living for today.

Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do. Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too. Imagine all the people, living in peace.

Imagine no possessions. I wonder if you can. No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man. Imagine all the people, sharing all the world.

You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one. I hope someday you’ll join us, and the world will be as one.

 I put the promises in bold: 

all people living for today… living in peace… no greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man… sharing all the world… and the world will be as one.

It sounds wonderful, doesn’t it? Peace, no hunger… brotherhood. But, of course, there are the pre-requisites to get there. I underlined those:

no heaven; no Hell; no countries; no religion; no possessions

Lennon gave us simply an excerpt from the list of necessities that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels laid out as the means to achieve utopia. Lennon didn’t list them all in his short song, but Marx included the destruction of marriage, the family and the church as well. The real cost of Socialism/Marxism/Communism has to be kept somewhat hidden. Lennon knew this for he said as much in his self-description of “Imagine”:

[it is] anti-religious, anti-nationalistic, anti-conventional, anti-capitalistic… but because it’s sugar-coated, it’s accepted.

And the truth under the covers of Socialism must be sugar-coated, for no one would want what really comes to those who take this broad road and the means to get there. It may sound so idealistic to croon about no one having possessions, but living that way, as we have seen it played out in places like East Berlin, is more of a hell on earth than even a hint of paradise. Policing out the belief in God is gruesome. “Stomping out” might be a better phrase. Vladimir Lenin said that the price to get to the socialistic utopia was worth it, even if it cost the lives of millions of people. Which it did. Some estimate 90 million at the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic’s bloody hands. 

In the end, it is nothing but a scam. The promise is whispered that if you join the revolution and take down the owners and then give up your possessions, you will enter into a utopia. What a scam. The East Berliners lived in poverty while the leaders lived in palaces. The same is true in Cuba and Venezuela and throughout socialism’s history.

I would like to begin a series that will look at the promises of this scam and the means and the “way” that is offered to get there and compare those claims to the ones we find in a biblical worldview. We are on the possible precipice of being swept into this by a host of believers in socialism and we best know what is down that broad path.

Here is a comment from “The Socialist Party of Great Britain”. I think it is important for you to read this, for it will help you understand the passion for the utopia they are fighting for and the deception in which it is couched:

"Imagine", the song, was unquestionably Lennon’s finest moment. Its lyrical and conceptual clarity shone sunlight of vision upon our dark and violent world. It urged us to imagine a world without property, without religion, without nations, living in peace. It postulated an economic order in which both greed and hunger would be impossible. Socialists also share this vision. They support the cause that approaches humanity towards the goal of a classless economic order in which wage labor, money and buying and selling have been replaced by free people working together to meet their needs without the constraints imposed by the market system, in short, a world of peace, equality, abundance and ecological sustainability. You may think that we are dreamers, but we are not the only ones. I hope someday you’ll join us. And the world will live as one.

 This is the “One-World-Government/Community” of Socialism/Marxism. We will look at that vision and compare it to God’s design.


Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.


To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

Kruptikos: Thinking Too Big
[ i  ] THE WAY TO DO A GREAT DEAL IS TO KEEP ON DOING A LITTLE. THE WAY TO DO NOTHING AT ALL IS TO BE CONTINUALLY RESOLVING THAT YOU WILL DO EVERYTHING.  CHARLES SPURGEON "XPR NVH XZ EZ V YMRVX ERVA KL XZ BRRU ZF EZKFY V AKXXAR. XPR NVH XZ EZ FZXPKFY VX VAA KL XZ WR JZFXKFDVAAH MRLZASKFY XPVX HZD NKAA EZ RSRMHXPKFY.”  JPVMARL LUDMYRZF In our hopefully upcoming DVD series “the Engagement” we will have a tour entitled “Fruit, Weeds and Counterfeits”. One of the key elements of that tour will include a survey of the many “counterfeits” that we find in our culture that deceive and pull us away from the true meaning of agape love. One of those counterfeits is best described by Linus from the cartoon “Peanuts”: I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand! It’s funny, but this is so true of our modern culture. This is the Hollywood notion of gushing about loving the World, but in so doing, loving no one, really. The true agape love that we are called to (we will try to define it in tE) can only be carried out within the context of a deep relationship. If you fervently seek the true good of an individual, you can only do that with a small number of folks. C. S. Lewis put it this way: It is easier to be enthusiastic about Humanity with a capital ‘H’ than it is to love individual men and women, especially those who are uninteresting, exasperating, depraved, or otherwise unattractive. Loving everybody in general may be an excuse for loving nobody in particular. And G. K. Chesterton noted this, which might seem as if he were speaking of the progressive elite in our culture today: They hate kings, they hate priests, they hate soldiers, they hate sailors. They distrust men of science, they denounce the middle classes, they despair of working men, but they adore humanity. Only they always speak of humanity as if it were a curious foreign nation…They are ceasing to be human in the effort to be humane. What is happening here is that we have embraced a counterfeit of true agape love. True agape love operates only in the “small”. We have substituted in its place the “large” and in so doing have destroyed it. I have, of late, been fascinated by the understanding that Jesus, when He started His ministry, did so by calling together a few men…twelve in number. Yet He really concentrated on three. If you study the Gospels, you will find that Jesus did heal many and He did speak to the multitudes, but it appears that His focus was on these few men. And when He left, it was to these few that He gave the charge to then go and make disciples of the nations. But how were they to do that? I would submit to you that they understood it within the example that He had given them. Paul expressed it this way: And the things which you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses, these entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also. 2 Timothy 2:2 All of this is in keeping with the God who created only two human beings and then told them to fill the earth. They were not expected to have a million babies. They would have a few and those would have a few and eventually this notion of the “few” would become the “many”. In summarizing the entire law, Jesus told us to agape God and to agape our neighbor. He didn’t tell us to agape the world, for we cannot do that. We are awash in a culture that has bowed the knee to itself. We worship ourselves. We believe that we are a god who can generate truth within our own heart. Because we are a slave to our hunger for significance, we then dream of big things for ourselves…in our daydreams we are the one that ends up being so, so significant. We get the girl, we get the guy, we win the lottery, we become famous, we become the greatest entertainer or athlete, we are loved, we are adored, we are the center of attention. Motivational speakers after motivational speakers encourage us to think big, to dream big dreams. We love to think big. We love to dream big dreams. I am not saying that there isn’t a place for that at specific times and places in one’s life, for there is a need to not settle for that which is less than what we can do or accomplish with the gifts God has given us. But we are in danger of reinforcing the lie that anything "significant" has to come from that which is “big” and never from that which is “small”….that “big” is “significant” and “small” is therefore “insignificant”. How deceitful. It keeps the body of Christ from thinking that there is something quite grand about dedicating your life to your family and the neighbors that live next door. It keeps us from action because we think our part is too “small”. It fuels our sense of insignificance. It ignites lust. It fans the flames of jealousy and class warfare. It destroys contentment. It makes us want. It renders us ineffective. We want the “big” and not the “small”. Despising the few, we want it all. Even when we want to help others, we can get overwhelmed by the reality that there are too many needy, too many sick, too many abused…just too many. The problems are just so large… And we end up doing nothing. Oh, we resolve to do something…but we have to make the “something” big in order for us to think that it is worthwhile and significant. But we can’t. So we don’t. I suspect that if Linus were real and he were sitting around the fireplace with Jesus and he uttered his sad commentary: “I love mankind, it’s people I can’t stand.” that it is possible Jesus would have smiled and then quietly said, “I can’t stand mankind. But I love people.” Don’t let “big” get in your way of taking time for the widow next door. The way to do a great deal is to keep on doing a little. The way to do nothing at all is to be continually resolving that you will do everything.  Charles Spurgeon
Surging Crime and a Look At Its Causes
“Crime is first a moral issue. Failure to address it on that level ensures it will only get worse.”  Cal Thomas Unless you are a Rumpelstiltskin, you must be keenly aware of our culture’s surging crime. In our own city, we have had eight murders already this year compared to only one by this time last year… and last year we set a record high for murders. This is in Colorado Springs, not Detroit or Chicago. In New York City, homicides are up 11% and shooting victims up 68%. In Georgia, some residents of Buckhead are wanting to secede from Atlanta because of the crime wave that they think the city doesn’t care about. As one Buckhead leader said, “we are in a war zone here” and the police are increasingly demoralized because they arrest criminals only to see them released by the legal system. The number of cops is way below what they need… some say as much as a third.  All this in the midst of, or aftermath of, calls to defund the police. But it is not just the surge in the number of crimes. There is now a breathtaking boldness and brazen attitude by which crime is being carried out.  The upper middle photo was taken as a man entered a pharmacy in San Francisco on a bike in the middle of the day. He then began sweeping things off the shelves into a garbage bag. You can see that a customer and security guard are filming it, but neither took any action. The thief filled the bag and then calmly rode out between them.  In the lower right, you can see a mob pouring into a store, boldly taking whatever they could carry and then casually strolling away with their spoils. The upper left shows a mob during one of these flash robberies with arms loaded; the upper right shows a guy who filled a shopping cart during a mob rob. Employees of TJ Maxx have been instructed to let mobs have what they want—for their own safety and because they or the store could be sued if one of the thieves were to be hurt. That is why six thieves could enter the Ultra Beauty salon in South Gate, California, and without resistance, fill up garbage bags of high-end perfumes and other costly merchandise, and then brashly walk out. This is also why the security guard in the pharmacy took no action. Makes one wonder what security guards are for. The lower left is the dregs from repeated robberies of train cars in Los Angeles. When the train rolls to a stop, a mob of thieves break into the rail cars and start busting open the cartons looking for high valuable goods. The boxes and stuffing and rejected items get thrown out of the cars leaving a railroad yard that looks like a trash dump.  Los Angeles and other U.S. politicians are perplexed by all of this and don’t know what to do, if anything. One leading politician expressed anger, not because mobs were stealing, but because some of them were selling the spoils online and making a filthy “profit”. This thinking has led to the legislative proposal that the government should oversee all private online sales, enforcing a “clear provenance” upon all goods sold. This would mean that if you wanted to sell your bicycle on Ebay, you would have to first prove to the State that you procured it by legal means. But, if you steal a bike and use it for yourself, then that seems to be okay to the Speaker of the House. If this seems absolutely crazy, then reread the article on God giving us over to a depraved mind. The final photo, middle right, is someone stealing a package off of a front porch in the middle of the day. This is becoming the new pandemic in our land. I am part of an online neighborhood community and it is rare that a day goes by without someone posting a Ring video or picture of someone stealing something from their home: packages on the porch, mail from the mailbox, or, as just happened yesterday, two guys pulling up in a pickup truck at 10am, nonchalantly pulling out tools and leisurely stealing the catalytic converter off her van. Thieves no longer come in the middle of the night with masks. Now they waltz up in plain sight. There is an increasing boldness with an attitude that “your goods are owed to me and I am entitled to take them whenever I want.” There has been much written about the surge of crime in our culture. On one side, the cause is laid at the feet of poverty and oppression by the ruling hegemony. On the other side, arguments point to the new laxity in laws and law enforcement.  I don’t agree with the former, for nothing shows a true statistical causality between poverty and crime. There are many poor countries with low crime rates. Some, however, misuse data and fail to see that it is the breakdown in the family that leads to both higher crime and lower financial wealth. It is a mistake to connect the crime with the poverty and ignore the ultimate cause: boys raised without an intact mom and dad, then becoming involved with gangs and crime. The latter, though, has merit. The Scripture (Romans 13) makes it clear that in God’s design, the State is responsible to punish evil. When it does not, evil will naturally prevail. At this very moment, Putin is threatening to take Ukraine. Does anyone doubt that he would do so if he knew for sure that no one would resist him? If he, like flash mobs, knew that no one would step in to stop him? Ukraine would be gone in a heartbeat. If he calculates the cost to be tolerable, he will most certainly do so. He is merely testing the waters right now to find that answer. So, too, is China’s eye upon Taiwan. They will certainly take it when they believe the cost of doing so is below a certain threshold.  The point is this: if the cost to carry out a crime is low compared to the spoils, then crime will escalate. Without a cost for their actions, it is in the nature of people to steal and murder and rape and pillage. How do we know this? Because of a good anthropology that comes from a biblical worldview. Man is fallen in his nature and is prone to evil given the opportunity. Hence God’s institution of, and design for, the State whose job is to punish evil. This is also why James Madison famously wrote in the Federalist Papers: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” But in a crazy world that has rejected God’s design and a true anthropology, the government is now casting off its role of punishing evil. California’s Proposition 47 made most thefts of less than $950 a misdemeanor, similar to a traffic ticket. Consequently, they are getting mobs raiding stores, guys on bicycles nonchalantly filling up a garbage bag with pharmacy goods, and trashed railroad yards and empty railroad cars.  Denver’s Police Chief, Paul Pazen, speaks boldly about how policy changes sit behind his city’s surge in crime. If you steal a car now in Denver, you will be let out on a “personal reconnaissance” bond, which basically means, sign here and you’re free. Chief Pazen speaks of arresting the same guy six times for auto theft in one year. This is more akin to our Fish and Game Department’s policy of “catch and release”.  But, it’s about to get much worse, for the Colorado Legislature passed a bill that becomes effective in a few weeks. It removes “felony” status from certain forms of drug dealing, theft, fraud, arson, kidnapping (false imprisonment), possession of weapons on school grounds, etc. These crimes will now be given a mere slap on the wrist and the criminal let go. How demoralizing for police officers to put their life on the line making an arrest, only to turn around tomorrow and find that the guy is back out on the street. It is not surprising, when the cost of committing a crime decreases down to almost nothing, that crime rises and criminal activity becomes bolder and more and more brazen.  With all this said, however, what has not been addressed in commentaries or news broadcasts, up until the Cal Thomas article, is that “crime is first a moral issue”. The State doesn’t determine ultimate right and wrong, God does. And when God declares something to be wrong, that declaration springs from His very nature. Stealing is wrong because it is contrary to the character of God.  Part of the great worldview divide that now plagues our nation is whether or not we want God to have any say in our personal, public or legal lives. No one any longer makes an appeal to God’s nature or Word when it comes to making laws. This is in stark contrast to our founding when William Blackstone, the legal author and tutor of all lawyers in early America, flatly declared that no law has any value if it is contrary to God’s law. This was to be the litmus test for any legislation and it was pounded into the head of all who made and prosecuted law in America. Not so today.  Making policy and law in accordance with God’s design leads to peace and prosperity, as best you can have in a fallen world. Therefore, it is not surprising that public policy, state and federal law and judicial decisions, absent any eternal or divine foundation, are not only woefully inadequate to mitigate crime, they exacerbate it. Cal is right when he says that crime will only get worse if we continue to see it as merely a social or oppressive issue, or driven by the prime ethic of malevolent compassion. All of this is leading us inexorably to a time when “everyone will do what is right in their own eyes”. Maybe we are already there. So, dear Remnant, how will be act in these times?  First of all, do not get caught up in the lies of this new worldview and allow it to squeeze you into its mold regarding right and wrong. Be sure of this: it is not your heart that establishes the ethical lines. Second, the fight against bad policy is a good fight and it should be fought as best we can. Third, never let the enemy sap your hope or your joy or your commitment to Him. Take the longer view. Keep your eyes upon Him. But finally, we must keep in mind that any real change is going to have to take place in the heart and soul of individuals. That will only come by the faithful and persistent prayers of the saints for those who are providentially placed near them along with the development of a significant relationship. If we remain faithful to this call of the Lord, then we pray we will begin to see a change in the few. And if the Lord should bless, that could translate into many. “And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.” Galatians 6:90     The encoded phrase was: TGKWQ KP LKGPN E WBGER KPPXQ. LEKRXGQ NB EHHGQPP KN BC NYEN RQJQR QCPXGQP KN AKRR BCRM ZQN ABGPQ.  TER NYBWEP