Inanimate Objects, Documents or Vitiated Minds and Corrupt Morals?

  1. Share
6 4

Another mass shooting. Little children dead. An eighteen-year-old, Salvador Ramos, killed them two days before they were to start their summer vacation.

And, once again, we get the same old rhetoric from all sides—all a thousand miles away from the problem and therefore the solution. We don't need blind rhetoric. We need divine wisdom and guidance. We need biblical prudence.

Instead, from one side we get calls for more gun laws; from the other, the 2nd Amendment. 

From one, the weapon is the main problem; from the other: “It isn’t guns that kill people, it’s people that kill people.” 

I’ve read everything I can get my eyes upon in the last few days to assess where we are as a culture in response to such a tragedy… and not just this one, but many in our recent past.

I’ve read calls to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’ve read a conspiracy theory that all of this is orchestrated by the Deep State. I’ve heard AOC say this is all the result of maleness. One journalist stated that when Ramos turned 18 as a male that was a red flag in itself. This, of course, is highly sexist, but our culture allows sexism in that direction, just as we allow racism in one direction. None of this empty rhetoric leads to solutions.

And, sadly but not surprisingly, many seemed to use the tragedy to make political hay.

In response to Uvalde, Canada is putting forward near draconian legislation that will end the sale, purchase, or even transfer of hand guns anywhere, anytime in Canada. Notwithstanding the reality that the Uvalde murders were committed with a rifle.

When Biden showed up in Uvalde, some people were shouting at him “Do something!” as if the solution is bound up somehow in the power of a Savior State. 

One congressman accused Ramos of being transgender which opened up another whole can of shouting and accusations. Piers Morgan called the police “sniveling cowards”. Another used Uvalde to argue and plead for a total defunding of all police, everywhere. 

The finger pointed in so many different directions it would be hard to count them: it’s guns; it’s male toxicity; it’s a conspiracy; it’s racism; it’s poverty; it’s an attack upon the Constitution; it’s mental illness; it’s the gun lobby; it’s white supremacy; it’s the police; it’s patriarchy... and on and on it goes.

The only one who came close was Cal Thomas, but he only hinted at it. In the last few words of today's article he said there was a moral issue involved as well. It was like a quiet whisper at the end.

We have fallen so far as a culture that we no longer dare to speak in terms of sin and morality. I'm not sure we even have the capacity to do so. We don't, or can't, see evil as evil, and call it as such. Evil doesn’t spring out of inanimate objects, evil is perpetrated by the fallen nature of man. It is the woeful state of the human heart and mind that moves one to despicable acts.

When Cain killed Abel, God wasn’t upset at the weapon, whether that was a rock or a club or Cain’s fists. It was the heart of Cain that God was pointing to when He warned him beforehand:

“So Cain was exceedingly angry and indignant, and he looked sad and depressed. And the Lord said to Cain, Why are you angry? And why do you look sad and depressed and dejected? If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin crouches at your door; its desire is for you, but you must master it.” Genesis 4:5b-7, AB

God judged Cain for his action because it was Cain who was responsible to “master”  his desires. This is, elsewhere in the Scripture, referred to as “self-control”, something we are generally and personally adverse to in our culture. We are bent more toward “self-aggrandizing” and "self-actualization".

Before the flood, it was the heart and mind that God was looking at:

“The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” Genesis 6:5, ESV

Early on in our culture, it would have been held folly for someone to lay the blame of evil anywhere else than the human heart. We read it constantly from the founding generation. My favorites are from John Adams and Daniel Webster:

“We have no government armed in power capable of contending in human passions unbridled by morality and religion...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.  It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

“To preserve the government we must also preserve morals.  Morality rests on religion; if you destroy the foundation, the superstructure must fall.  When the public mind becomes vitiated and corrupt, laws are a nullity and constitutions are waste paper.”

When human passions are no longer bridled (mastered/self-controlled) by transcendent values, when the public mind becomes vitiated and corrupt, neither the Constitution or laws will be of any value.

And this is the focal point of crime in our culture. Whether it is someone stealing your Amazon package off of your porch in broad daylight or cutting the catalytic converter off of your car; whether it is a mob cleaning out a store or random beatings of a stranger on the street; whether it is selling young girls for sex or killing people in alleys or bars or elementary schools…it is a heart and mind issue with respect to the transcendent understanding of good and evil.

And it is here that we find our nemesis, because we have stripped from the public square the allowance to speak of such things as sin or of transcendent morality or of corrupt and vitiated minds. We don’t even know what vitiated means anymore. Our prime ethic of Malevolent Compassion forbids one to call the thinking of the heart and mind of another “wrong”. (Unless, of course, that accusation flows in the right direction and only the right direction.) How dare anyone accuse another of “sin”?

And all of this, then, prevents us from looking also at those things in our culture that provoke evil thoughts. When James Holmes killed 12 people in an Aurora theater presenting “The Dark Knight Rises”, he was acting out the Joker. But the rhetoric after the massacre was all the same: guns and Constitution. No one wanted to ask if our movies were provoking evil in the viewers hearts and minds. No one asked questions about the blatant violence played out in video games or played as lyrics in our music or played out before our eyes in high definition color and surround sound in movies and videos that, post-Aurora, are still being produced continually without restraints. 

No one asks the questions as to whether the value of human life in our culture, and therefore in our youth, is being horrifically devalued when we fight tooth and nail to retain the slaughter of millions of innocent babies in the womb. If you can kill your baby if you want to, then why can I not kill if I want to?

No one asks the question of the cost associated with teaching our children that they are nothing but accidental germs in a random, ethical free cosmos.

No one asks about the cost of removing transcendent moral values from the classroom.

No one wants to look at the clear evidence that a young man who grows up in a single-female-parent home has a much higher likelihood of getting involved in crime and drugs. Just to pose that question would raise a firestorm. It is verboten. 

So, we will yell “gun control” and “Constitution” and no one will dare talk about the real cancer in our culture. Because all of this would inevitably lead us into a discussion about God and His transcendent ethics for man. 

And we just don’t want that.

So, nothing will change. 

I would be happy if someone would acknowledge the real problem and maybe say, “Until we can begin to change the broken family problem and the violent entertainment problem, etc., it would be wise to keep semi-automatic weapons of any kind out of the hands of anyone under 30.” I might vote for that if it were accompanied by an acceptance of the real problem.

But until then, all of our machinations are taking us in the wrong direction. Mexico has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the world and they also have one of the highest homicide rates. Trying to solve the problem by regulating inanimate objects or appealing to the Constitution isn’t going to get it done.

Dear Remnant, do not lose hope in these circumstances, for our hope does not rest in what happens around us, but what has happened for us 2000 years ago through Christ’s death and resurrection. Remain strong. Raise up Noble Males and Virtuous Females. 

Join me, if you will, each Tuesday, noon Eastern, to pray that God will grant our culture repentance. 

 

 

 

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Comments

To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

14
If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then... (#0)
The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the most important truth claim in a biblical worldview. It is the key apologetic for Christianity. It is the most important event in history. The implications of the Resurrection are so deeply woven into the fabric of our Christian faith that it is important for us to continually embed its truths into our heart and mind such that it becomes an ever-present reality. To do this, I would like for us to ponder fifty compelling arguments and implications that are true if Jesus, indeed, “rose from the dead.” We will look at these, one a day, over the next seven weeks. This will take us through Ascension Day and Pentecost. The latter two are important days of remembrance following the Resurrection and we will highlight them. But more importantly, I want to help people contemplate, on a daily basis, over a sustained period of time, the tremendous significance of the Resurrection. We will do this by considering not only the many proofs, but also the many deep implications. I would encourage you to do this as devotions with your spouse or as a study for your small group and then engage in a healthy discussion (suggested questions will be provided in the daily email). My prayer is that God will use these days to increase faith within the Body of Christ and our ability to provide a "neighborly apologetic" to those who are open to hear as the result of the relationships we are building with them. Paul states that without the resurrection, our faith would be in vain and we would still be lost.  “… if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.”      1 Corinthians 15:17 This is not a minor statement, and it should cause us pause, for it puts this unique historical event into sharp perspective. Without the Resurrection, we are hopelessly lost. We are without a true faith and we are unforgiven, still condemned in our sins. We should probably read that verse over several times before plowing forward. It is easy for me, and possibly you, to treat Easter as another Christian holiday marked by multiple, and possibly extensive, preparations. Church choirs rehearse diligently and on overtime, special services are prepared (think Good Friday and sometimes Sunrise Services), thousands of lilies are tended and provoked to bloom at the right time and are purchased to line sanctuary rails, special meals are planned and prepared and joyously consumed, treasure hunts are created, painted eggs are hidden and Easter baskets are filled with chocolate bunnies, peeps, and who knows what else the market has, and will, come up with.  The point here is that just like Christmas and Thanksgiving and every other holiday, including birthdays, anniversaries, and the multitude of “take-your-boss-to-lunch” kind of days, they are preceded with much preparation, happy execution, and then forgotten except to toss the wrappings into the trash and press on with life as usual. When I was at the White House, the annual “Easter Egg Roll” on the south lawn was a big deal with weeks of preparation, followed immediately by a massive clean-up and the Secret Service hustling folks out of the “compound." The next day, it was impossible to find any evidence that there had been anything going on. For the Resurrection, however, Paul implies that it is something so critical to our faith that it should be an ever present reality. The astounding cry, “He lives!” should be ongoing, not a one-and-done holiday. Certainly, "We serve a risen Savior, He's in the world today," as the famous hymn states, is an astounding, continual reality. I believe it is important for us to frequently ponder and meditate upon the deep implications that the tomb was really, truly empty and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead is absolutely true. So, we will look at not only these implications, but also the apologetic propositions and the incredible truths that logically follow this unmatched historical assertion. We will generally lay down the apologetic arguments first and then deal with the implications. And hopefully, after working your way through all of this, you will have imprinted these implications and truths deep in your heart such that they will help you with your walk into the darkness we call future. Because it is the Resurrection of Christ that stands not only at the forefront in the apologetic reality of who Jesus is and what God has done for us, but also the enduring hope we have in Christ. As another famous hymn states: "Because He lives, I can face tomorrow." [Next: It Would Have Shaken Everything]
8
7 Threats in Our Times: (#1) The Rise of the Scoffer and the Depraved Mind
[previous] There are two progressions in Scripture that appear to be manifested in our culture and in our times. These are not onward and upward progressions, but more of a downward spiral. One of those progressions comes primarily from Proverbs where we are introduced to three kinds of people: the simple, the fool, and the scoffer. They are continually contrasted with the wise. We meet all three together in Proverbs 1:22, How long, O simple ones, will you love being simple? How long will scoffers delight in their scoffing and fools hate knowledge? The simple reminds me of the 60’s, when the mantra was “I’m ok; you’re ok”. This was the throwing off of moral values, doing what felt good and the live-and-let-live, carefree days of “Hey, man, cool!” The simple, however, sometimes continues on to become the fool. It is here we see an open rejection of God; where evil is good and good is evil: The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile… Psalm 14:1 The fool hates truth and the knowledge of God, rejecting it in favor of whatever he gathers from the world and the pleasure he can derive from it. He is a fool, but he keeps it relatively to himself. But, in a fallen world, the fool can descend into final stage: the scoffer. This is the militant fool. He is arrogant and haughty: Scoffer is the name of the arrogant, haughty man who acts with arrogant pride. Proverbs 21:24 … he brings division, quarreling and abuse: Drive out a scoffer, and strife will go out, and quarreling and abuse will cease. Proverbs 22:10 … and he is a horror to the culture and mankind: … the scoffer is an abomination to mankind. Proverbs 24:9 Note this next verse carefully for we have seen the consequences in our day: Scoffers set a city aflame… Proverbs 29:8 When a culture progresses to the scoffer, it finds itself up against a militancy that does not sleep in its incessant drive to bring the culture down: …they cannot rest until they do evil; they are robbed of sleep till they make someone stumble. Proverbs 4:16 The second progression is found in Paul’s letter to the Romans. It, too, is not upward, but downward. Here we are told that God’s wrath is being revealed to those who reject the truth and do not glorify God. There are then three stages, each beginning with “Therefore God gave them over…” as God gives people over to a succeeding, and descending pathology: first to sexual impurity, then shameful lusts, and finally to a depraved mind. The first is that God gives people over to “sexual impurity”. This is a sexual immorality that is within the normal male/female relationship. It isn’t hard to think about what happened in America toward the end of the 1800’s and the beginning of the 1900’s. With Darwin on the rise of acceptance, Dewey stripping God and ethics from schools and Freud focusing everyone on sex, our culture took a major turn. World War I could have been a warning to us, but we ignored it and ran right into the Roaring 20’s. The great depression and World War II might have also been warnings, but we ignored them as well. Sexual impurity was on the loose in America and in her arts and media all the way through the 60’s. Then it seems we moved from the simple-minded to the fool and God gave us over to "shameful lusts". No longer was sexual impurity confined to the natural male/female sexuality. We moved rapidly into unnatural sexual impurity and the culture embraced it all the way to the Supreme Court.  And now, it appears that God has given us over to a “depraved mind”.  What does this mean? The Greek word for “depraved” is adokimon (a-dok’-ee-mon). It means “unqualified”. But what is an “unqualified” mind? What does it look like? If you sat next to someone with a depraved mind, how would you recognize it? Would they be frothing at the mouth? Throwing things? Twitching? I flew to California to be with my good friend and great Greek scholar, Dr. Paul Fowler, to discuss and wrestle with this. The key may be in first understanding what a “qualified” mind would be. God created us with a mind that was rational. It could recognize reality, comprehend logic and reason with the Lord when He said “come let us reason together”. It was a mind that had what we call “common sense”.  An “unqualified” mind, then, would be a mind that was no longer rational or entertained logical arguments or reason. It would appear to think and say things that were irrational or lacking common sense. When Jesus encountered the Gerasene man who was possessed, naked and acting crazy, Jesus healed him and he was found clothed and “in his right mind”. We see the same with Nebuchadnezzar, out in a pasture eating grass like a cow after God had judged him, until “he came to his senses”.  We now find ourselves in a culture where it is increasingly difficult to have rational discussions with people unless it is over benign things like the weather, sports or your flower beds.  Not long ago I was trying to have a rational discussion regarding voter ID. We were on a plane and the lady next to me mentioned that she had forgotten her ID and missed her flight because she had to go home and get it. I casually mentioned that it was strange that someone is required to show an ID to fly from Houston to Colorado Springs, but there is a battle over whether or not someone should have to show an ID to vote. That started an irrational discussion that ended with her giving me a dirty look. Have you tried to have a rational discussion regarding abortion? Or math being viewed as racist? Or allowing young children to select their own gender? What about training our military to despise the country they are supposed to fight for? What about forcing government contractors into re-education programs and forcing them to sign letters of "guilt" and "confessions" because their skin was light? Many people that I know shake their heads at such things and breathe something like “the world has gone crazy!” We become frustrated because of the lack of “common sense” and “no one seems to listen”. Maybe we have been given over to a depraved mind. What is the response to these things? How do we live as wise in the times in which we live? Well, first we need to recognize that the way we evangelicals have interfaced with the world must change. All of our apologetics are based upon logic. And, they are based upon the assumption that we are dealing with a logical and rational mind.  That assumption may no longer be valid. We are trying to fit rational arguments into irrational minds and we get frustrated when it bounces off without even a glimmer of recognition—or we get a scoffer’s rebuke. Because, if we add to this the rise of the arrogant and haughty scoffer, who stirs up strife and division and sets the city aflame, we find ourselves in difficult times. All the core social powers are increasingly setting themselves up against a biblical worldview, cancelling those who disagree. What do we do? I know of no other approach than the one that I believe Jesus gave to us to do. It is the focus of the Engagement Project and it calls us to engage with wisdom, grace and truth, and to do so in the context of building significant relationships with a few people and bathing that relationship in diligent and fervent prayer. Only God can change the scoffer’s heart. Only God can heal the depraved mind. Only then will the rational truth have fertile soil in which to flourish. [previous] [next]